Introduction
This course looks at key events in Australian history, and different interpretations of those events.
Brains Trust
Courage Quests
Human Inter-actions
This course looks at key events in Australian history, and different interpretations of those events.
This course contains distressing content.
Australia's First Nations people lived here for more than 65,000 years before Europeans arrived en masse in 1788. At that time, there were between 750,000 and 1.2 million people living in over 500 different nations. They spoke more than 250 languages, with 800 or so variations called dialects. About 100 more languages were spoken by older people. Life was culturally and artistically rich. First Nations people hunted, gathered, and grew food. They made shelter and clothing and lived by laws and customs that were interwoven with their spiritual connection to the land. The next video provides a brief introduction to Australian First Nations cultures:
Playing time: 4:24
Recording history (5 coins)
Indigenous Australian cultures use oral history, which is the process of passing stories from one generation to the next in order to remember the past and remind people
about important values and rules governing society. First Nations stories are also represented in a range of other media including song, dance, and visual art. Visual representations can be found in caves and on rocks across Australia. How do you record history? What do you do when you want to remember something? Share your thoughts on the 'Recording history forum'.
Aboriginal cultures
The next video was produced by Nungalinya College in Darwin, with participants coming from the Tiwi Islands, Elcho Island, the Torres Strait Islands, and an
Aboriginal-owned and operated cattle station called The Bulman. Indigenous cultures differ substantially across Australia, and the way of life in the video relates particularly to people living near the sea.
Playing time: 21:21
Cultural differences (5 coins)
Answer the following questions on the 'Cultural differences forum':
The Dreaming
The
Dreaming is a framework for understanding the world that explains its
origins and history, and structures social life. It's sometimes referred
to as 'The Dreamtime', although that may cause people to think it only
refers to a particular time in the past. Indigenous
Australian languages have their own words for it, including
'tjurkurrpa' (Pitjantjatjara people of north-western South Australia),
'wongar' (Indigenous people of north-east Arnhem Land), and 'altjeringa'
(Arrente people of Central Australia).
Playing time: 6:46
Women in Indigenous cultures are traditionally tasked with caring for and educating children and young people. They are also tasked with gathering food, including edible plants, roots, grubs, fruits, and honey. In some cultures, they also hunt.
Playing time: 5:24
Gender roles (5 coins)
As you can see in the videos above, men and women have different roles in different First Nations. Think about your own community - do men and women
have different roles? If so, how does the community decide which roles will be played by each gender? Why do you think so many communities across the world structure society by gender?
Do you think it's useful to divide society by gender, or not? Share your thoughts on the 'Gender roles forum'.
Indigenous agriculture and trade
Until recently, many Europeans thought Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities were hunter-gatherers who never developed farming. We now know that
Indigenous Australians were some of the first people in the world to develop agriculture. They also had extensive trade routes, to transport valued items and produce across the country
. You can learn more by watching the next video:
Playing time: 12:33
Historical representations (5 coins)
Answer the following questions on the 'Agriculture and trade forum', after watching the above video:
Stereotypes (5 coins)
The previous video shows how historical representations can shape our understanding of the past and lead to harmful stereotypes and other misconceptions. The next video breaks down a few more
misconceptions about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people:
Playing time: 2:15
Answer these questions on the 'Stereotypes forum', after watching the video above:
The Stolen Generations
From 1860 to 1970, it was official policy to steal Aboriginal children from their parents and place them in religious missions, boarding schools
, and adoptive European families. This was a systematic effort to eradicate Aboriginal history, culture, and identity, and to assimilate them into white Australia. It had a profound impact not just on the tens of thousands of people who were taken, but also on their families, communities, and descendants.
Like other forms of genocide, it remains in the hearts and minds of the people whose lives it impacted. The next video features an interview with a survivor of the Stolen Generations:
Playing time: 3:54
European motivations
Why did Europeans steal Aboriginal children and raise them in white households? Some missionaries thought they were doing good and that by teaching Aboriginal children English and raising them in white culture, they would have more opportunities to succeed. In reality, the Stolen Generations were cut off from loved-ones, culturally dislocated, and subject to physical and psychological abuse. Many white
Australians
found it convenient to control the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders for their own material benefit. Destroying Indigenous communities gave them access to Aboriginal land and a new source of labour to exploit.
Personal experiences
The next video features another account of what it was like to be part of the Stolen Generations:
Playing time: 3:57
Playing time: 3:54
Raised by missionaries (5 coins)
Non-Indigenous
Australians can never really understand what it is like to experience this type of violence. With that in mind, try to imagine
what it might be like if you were kidnapped as an infant and kept on an island to be raised by missionaries from another religion. How would you feel? How would
you feel when you were able to leave the island at 18? What might you do? Type your thoughts into a Word document and save it to the 'Raised by missionaries submission'.
Playing time: 14:50
Sheila's childhood experiences drove her to work in the community sector, helping other children who find themselves being mistreated by the system. She decided that she would be in a better position to change the system by becoming a part of it rather than fighting it from the outside.
Lasting consequences
British people eroded Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, stole Indigenous land
and water, introduced unfamiliar diseases, and brought alcohol and other
drugs to Australia. Aboriginal Australians suffer the
consequences of racism to this day, both explicit and implicit. Many of them are still kept from participating fully in mainstream economic and social
life.
Myths and stereotypes
Some Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people answer anonymous questions in the next video. In doing so,
they debunk some of the myths and stereotypes that persist today about Indigenous Australians.
Playing time: 20:14
Complete at least 20 coins' worth of activities below.
Answer the following questions on the 'Local history forum':
During the 2019-20 bushfire crisis, many people called for governments to consult more with Aboriginal communities about how to prevent catastrophic bushfires. Some Indigenous groups use a practice called 'cultural burning' to keep their land
healthy, while governments around Australia use 'controlled burning'. Take a look at the video below to learn more about these methods:
Playing time: 11:00
The book Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence by Doris Pilkington is about one family's experience as part of the Stolen Generations. It was adapted into a popular film called Rabbit-Proof Fence (2002):
Playing time: 2:50
Read the book and/or watch the film, then write a short essay in response to the following question:
What can we learn from Rabbit-Proof Fence about Australian history, and Australia today?
When you are done, upload your essay to the 'Rabbit-Proof Fence submission'.
Terra Nullius
Historical events are interpreted differently at different times, by different groups of people. That is to say, different people tell different stories about the past. The British 'First Fleet' landed in Australia in 1788. According
to British authorities at the time, Australia was 'Terra Nullius', which means 'nobody's land' in Latin. This allowed the British to say they did not 'invade' Australia, but that they simply occupied empty land. This was the most popular interpretation
of Australian history until just a few decades ago. Things began to change in the 90s with the Mabo Case, when the High Court of Australia ruled that Australia was not unoccupied, but rather it was inhabited by its First Nations people. This gave
rise to the concept of 'Native Title', which recognises First Nations people as traditional owners of their land. Take a look at this video to learn more about Eddie Mabo and the fight for Indigenous land rights:
Playing time: 3:28
When learning about history, people often have to rely on incomplete or otherwise flawed sources. The ship's log for the HMS Endeavour, for example, says James Cook sighted Australia on the 19th of April, 1770 - but there are reasons to think this date may be wrong.
Playing time: 2:07
Relations between Indigenous Australians and the British quickly became violent. Take a look at this article to learn more about the encounter between Captain Cook and the Gweagal clan in 1770:
First contact
Many Indigenous Australians were not sure what to make of the British when they first arrived. In the next video, an Indigenous Australian woman explains what it was like to see a white person for the first time:
Playing time: 5:20
Playing time: 13:34
In many cases, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives have been translated, re-told, or selectively edited by non-Indigenous people. Until recently, written accounts directly produced or published by Indigenous sources have been rarer. How might this shape our perspective of history, and why might it be a problem? What can we do to get a more accurate picture of Australian history? Why might some Indigenous people be reluctant to share their perspective with non-Indigenous people? Share your thoughts on the 'Indigenous perspectives forum'.
LandIndigenous Nations use features of the natural landscape to identify territory. They also have established customs for seeking to enter the land of other First Nations. The British view land as the property of an individual or the state rather than the community as a whole, giving owners exclusive rights over its use. They claim particular areas and make money by charging people to live on it and farm it. This stands in contrast to the traditional Indigenous approach to land, which is explained in the next video:
Playing time: 6:14
Indigenous cultures today
Take a look at the next video to learn about the continued importance of Indigenous Australian cultures:
Playing time: 10:52
When the British first came to Australia, they set it up as a penal colony, which is a place to send criminals to serve out their sentences. As such, most of the first British migrants were convicts, soldiers, and jailers. Over time, more free settlers moved to Australia, and many of the convicts remained after their sentences to take opportunities that they wouldn't have had back in Britain.
Playing time: 4:25
Ancestry (5 coins)
Where do your family come from? How far back can you trace your ancestry? If you are non-Indigenous, can you pinpoint the moment when your ancestors arrived in Australia? You can research your ancestry online, and by talking
to relatives. Post what you find on the 'Ancestry forum'.
Australian immigration policy
The 'White Australia' policies were a set of laws instituted from 1901 that made it harder for people to immigrate from China and other non-English-speaking countries. The Second World War brought about changes
to migration policy, with a wider group of Europeans being encouraged to come to Australia under the slogan 'populate or perish'. Immigration law continued to change in the 1960s, allowing more people to arrive from Asia. We still have tough restrictions
on immigration, however. Many people both in Australia and overseas are critical of our treatment of those seeking asylum or refuge from persecution or suffering overseas. Watch the next video for a brief history of immigration in Australia:
Playing time: 3:46
Many Australians believe Australia should place further restrictions on immigration. Take a look at the next video to learn more about the issue:
Playing time: 3:38
Immigration (5 coins)
Why do you think immigration is such a controversial topic in Australia? Share your thoughts on the 'Immigration forum'.
The First Fleet arrived on the 26th of January, now referred to as 'Australia Day'. Many Australians boycott the celebration each year, arguing that we should not celebrate an event associated with so much suffering. Watch the next video to
hear from some Aboriginal Australians on the issue:
Playing time: 2:55
Australia Day (5 coins)
Some people argue that Australia Day should be moved to a different date, to celebrate Australia without overlooking the suffering and loss caused by the arrival of the British. What do you think about this? Share your thoughts on the 'Australia Day forum'.
Complete at least 20 coins' worth of activities below.
Some convicts shipped to Australia were very young children:
Playing time: 3:40
Imagine you were a child convict being shipped to Australia from Britain. Write a poem or short story to describe the experience, and share it on the 'Convict forum'.
The boat that brought Captain James Cook to Botany Bay in 1770 was the HMS Endeavour. Draw a diagram of the boat, annotating your drawing with the following features:
Upload your work to the 'HMS Endeavour submission'.
Australia (2008) is a film set in 1939, just before the start of World War 2. It depicts life on a remote cattle station near the border between Western Australia and the Northern Territory.
Playing time: 2:06
Create a YouTube video about an aspect of Australian history that interests you. It should be at least 4 minutes long, and you must list all of your references throughout the video, at the end of the video, or in the video description. Your aim
should be to inform the audience. You can read how to create, edit, and upload videos here. When you are done, go ahead and share your work on the 'History video forum'.
The Great War
The next video explains how World War I unfolded, from 1914 to 1918:
Playing time: 8:48
The video refers to the terrible conditions in the trenches in France, known as the 'Western Front'.
Gallipoli
The Australian and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) was formed in Egypt in 1914 when Australian troops joined Britain in World War I. Australians from all backgrounds fought in World War I, including Aboriginal Australians and migrants
from outside Britain. ANZAC forces fought all across the world during World War I, with soldiers in New Guinea, the Cocos Islands, Egypt, Palestine, Persia, Russia, and western Europe. ANZAC is probably most well-known for fighting the Ottoman Empire
in Turkey, where tens of thousands of young men died on the beaches and cliffs of Gallipoli. The next video provides a short explanation of the campaign.
Playing time: 4:42
Many historians argue that the Battle of Gallipoli was a senseless attack, and it would not have occurred the way it did if we had better intelligence and surveillance capabilities. Take a look at the next video to see some rare footage from the battle, in 1915:
Playing time: 3:15
ANZAC Day (5 coins)
ANZACs first landed at Gallipoli on the 25th of April 1915, which we now call 'ANZAC Day'. Create an artefact to commemorate ANZAC Day. It could be a poem, a drawing, a photograph, a garden - anything that might
capture some aspect of the ANZAC experience. When you are done, add your creation to the main page of the 'ANZAC Day Wiki'. You can learn how to edit Wikis here.
Conscription
The United Kingdom introduced conscription in 1916, which forced young men to enlist in the armed forces. Australians voted against conscription in two referendums, choosing to rely on volunteers instead. This video is an advert
that would have been screened in cinemas to attract volunteers:
Playing time: 2:26
Propaganda (5 coins)
Communications designed to further a political agenda are known as 'propaganda'. Like the advertisement above, propaganda often tries to persuade people by misleading them or only showing them part of the story. The number
of volunteers dropped off significantly as news of the war reached Australia, especially as word spread about the horrors of Gallipoli.
The end of the Great War
So how and why did World War I end? The next video explains events leading to the Armistice that officially marked the end of the war in 1918:
Playing time: 2:48
The role of the US (5 coins)
The US joined World War I several years into the war, in April 1917. This gave the Allied forces a huge boost of troops, military supplies and warships. Research the following questions and share your responses on
the 'US in WWI forum', along with a reference for each one:
The beginning of the war
The Second World War started when Germany invaded Poland in 1939, prompting Britain and France to declare war with Germany. Adolf Hitler rose to power in the 30s, fuelled by strong national resentment about the way Germany
had been treated at the end of World War I. The Treaty of Versailles was especially controversial, requiring Germany and its allies to pay for the enormous loss and damage caused during the First World War. World War II is known for its use of modern
weaponry, making it even more lethal than its predecessor. It is also known for the Holocaust, which was a large-scale attempt by the Nazis to eradicate Jewish people and other groups they considered inferior.
World War II was the deadliest conflict in human history, leading to the loss of between 70 and 85 million lives. It is also enormously complex, involving over 100 million people from more than 30 different countries.
Australia under attack
In the first few years of World War II, Australian ships were attacked by Japanese planes and submarines, leading Australia to fear invasion. On the 19th of February 1942, Japanese planes bombed Darwin. In May
1942, Sydney Harbour was attacked by Japanese midget submarines. Japanese forces also attacked Broome, Horn Island, Exmouth Gulf, and Townsville. Australian authorities did not always make news of these attacks available right away, to help control
morale. Watch this video to learn more about the attack on Darwin:
Playing time: 4:00
Annexation (5 coins)
Japan posed a real threat to Australia during World War II, with many people fearing an attack on the mainland. How might life be different if everything north of the Brisbane Line had been annexed by Japan? Write a
'drabble' to answer this question, which is a 100-word creative writing piece. You could describe how events unfolded at a large scale, or you could focus on one particular moment. When you're done, share your work on the 'Annexation forum'.
Children in cities were temporarily sent to live in rural areas, where there was thought to be a lower risk of bombing. Compared to Britain and Europe, there were few evacuations in Australia.
Nuclear warfare
The US dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima on August the 6th, 1945. They dropped another nuclear bomb on Nagasaki three days later. Japan surrendered six days after that. Take a look at the video below to learn more
about what happened in Hiroshima:
Playing time: 4:12
The next video looks at how the attacks were depicted by the US as a legitimate and necessary way to end the war:
Playing time: 3:36
Moral justification (5 coins)
Some historians argue that the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki sped up the end of the war and in doing so, saved more lives than if the war had been allowed to drag on. Others think the bombings were entirely
unjustified. What do you think? Would more lives have been lost if the US had not bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki? And if so, does that provide sufficient moral justification for the attack? Research the issue and then share your thoughts on the 'Moral
justification forum'.
The Korean War started in 1950, partly as a result of how power was divided up after World War II. The next video gives a brief overview of the conflict:
Playing time: 4:31
The 38th parallel (5 coins)
Do you think the Korean War would have ended sooner if US and United Nations troops had stopped when they first reached the 38th parallel? Why did they push on? Do you think this was the right decision, or not? Why?
Share your thoughts on the '38th parallel forum'.
The Vietnam War
Australia joined the Vietnam War in the 1960s to support the US in their attempt to stop communism from spreading from North to South Vietnam. The war became incredibly unpopular both in Australia and the US, and troops were
finally withdrawn in the 1970s. Take a look at the next video for a brief outline of events:
Playing time: 4:37
Homecoming (5 coins)
The Australian public were mostly against involvement in Vietnam, and so soldiers were not celebrated upon their return like the ANZACs. Read this piece by
an Australian veteran, then complete the 'Homecoming template' and upload it to the 'Homecoming submission'.
Australia participated in the 'War on Terror' started by the US after the terrorist attacks on September the 11th, 2001. The US invaded Afghanistan in October of that year. Watch this video to learn more:
Playing time: 5:55
Playing time: 1:57
Radicalisation (5 coins)
Military groups throughout history have used suicide attacks to further their aims, from the use of dynamite to assassinate Russian emperor Alexander II in 1881 to Japanese Kamikaze pilots who flew their planes into
warships during World War II. More recently, terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and Islamic State have recruited people to wear and detonate incendiary devices in crowded areas. Motives for this are complex and controversial. Suicide bombers and
other mass murderers typically go through a process of radicalisation, where their worldview gradually becomes more extreme. The perpetrator of the 2019 Christchurch mosque shootings in New Zealand, for example, drew a lot of motivation from online
communities with extremist political beliefs. Take a look at this page and then share what you find out about why some people are driven to violent extremism on the 'Radicalisation
forum'.
Complete at least 20 coins' worth of activities below.
Write a front-page news report about the bombing of Hiroshima in 1945, from either the Japanese perspective or the US perspective. Describe events leading up to the attack, and its aftermath. Include an explanation of how atomic bombs work, using the following video to guide you:
Playing time: 5:39
When you are done, share your article on the 'Atomic news forum'.
Children of war
Playing time: 1:58
Guilty as trained
Playing time: 2:57
War is coming
Playing time: 1:06
The Somme
Playing time: 2:01
Add visuals to the audio and then upload your work to YouTube. You can read how to edit videos here. When you are done, share your work on the 'War performance forum'.
Choose one of the films below, or a different war film of your choice. Note that the following films are rated 'M' in Australia, which means they are not recommended for people under the age of 15. They all contain disturbing content, and you will need to get permission from an adult to watch them.
Gallipoli (1981)
Playing time: 1:43
Grave of the Fireflies (1988)
Playing time: 1:43
Jojo Rabbit (2019)
Playing time: 2:17
Write a literary analysis of your chosen film, in response to the following question:
What does the film say about the nature of war, and how does it do so?
In your essay, you should provide a brief summary of the film and refer to specific events as necessary, but you should not spend a lot of time recounting the whole film. Instead, you should focus on the theme of war and how the movie uses film and narrative techniques to explore that theme. You could comment on some or all of the following:
Many of the soldiers who returned from World War I suffered from something referred to at the time as 'shell shock'. For this activity, you are asked to write a 500-word research essay in response to the following question:
What is shell shock, and how has our understanding of it evolved over time?
You can read how to write essays here. When you are done, upload your work to the 'Shell shock submission'.
The final section of this course covers significant moments in Australian history, many of which are of particular importance to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
The 1967 Referendum
Over 90% of people voted 'yes' in the 1967 referendum to change the Constitution to formally recognise First Nations people. Until that time, Aboriginal Australians were not counted in the census, and the Australian government was unable to make laws for them. Before the referendum,
laws made in relation to Indigenous Australian people were made by the various colonial (later state and territory) governments. The 1967 Referendum also allowed for Indigenous Australians to be counted in the national census for the first time. You
can learn more about it in this video:
Playing time: 2:52
The 1967 referendum was a step forward, but there are still serious issues with inequality. The next video looks at how Australia has failed to address them.
Playing time: 4:20
Outcomes (5 coins)
The 1967 Referendum had both short-term and long-term outcomes. Research the outcomes of the referendum, and then answer the following questions on the 'Referendum outcomes forum':
The Mabo Case and the Native Title Act
On the 3rd of June 1992, Eddie Mabo won a High Court ruling (after more than a decade of legal battles) that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people occupied Australia before the arrival of the British, and could legally be considered owners of their land. This led to the passing of the Native Title Act in 1993, to legislate ways traditional owners could gain recognition and better access to and control over their lands.
Playing time: 3:28
Land ownership (5 coins)
What does it mean to 'own' land? Should people be able to own land, or should they just be able to use it for a set period of time? Should people be able to earn money by renting their land to others? Should people be able to earn money through mining and other ecologically destructive processes? Should unoccupied or unused land be made use of for social causes like housing the homeless? Share your thoughts on the 'Land ownership forum'.
The apology
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd issued a formal apology for the Stolen Generations on February the 13th, 2008. Watch this video for a short extract from the speech:
Playing time: 3:11
This short documentary provides more information about the event:
Playing time: 5:49
Progress (5 coins)
The apology was framed as the first step toward reconciliation, and it highlighted the urgent need to address Indigenous inequality. It has been more than 10 years since then. Research the extent to which inequality has been addressed in that time. Present your findings on the 'Progress forum', along with a suggestion about what else could be done.
The Uluru Statement from the Heart
In May 2017, a council of First Nations leaders met at Uluru for a convention to consider the way Indigenous Australians are represented in the Constitution. They indicated that they want a stronger political voice, and a chance to take responsibility for resolving issues that affect them. Take a look at the video below to learn more about
the process:
Playing time: 6:38
The Uluru Statement from the Heart requested a referendum to alter the Constitution to provide for an advisory board to parliament that would represent the views of First Nations people. The Turnbull government refused this request. Take a look at the video below for a discussion about the issue:
Playing time: 4:34
Indigenous representation (5 coins)
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull argued that they would not go ahead with the referendum because it would fail. They also argued that the two existing Indigenous members of Parliament provided sufficient Indigenous representation. What do you think of these arguments? Do you think the Australian Government were right to refuse the request? Why or why not? How could Australia ensure the views of First Nations people are genuinely heard and understood? Share your thoughts on the 'Indigenous representation forum'.
Same-sex marriage legislation
The next video features a discussion about same-sex marriage from 2008, several years before it was made legal in Australia:
Playing time: 7:23
Defining marriage (5 coins)
Parts of the above discussion centre around definitions of the word 'marriage'. What does it mean to you, and why? Do you think it's an important concept, or not? Do you hope to get married one day? Share your thoughts on the 'Defining marriage forum'.
Legalisation
The Australian Government relented to public pressure in 2017 and agreed to hold a survey on the issue of same-sex marriage. Surveys are not binding like referendums, but they can influence the way Members of Parliament vote by providing some insight into public opinion. Take a look at the video below for a short news report about the survey:
Playing time: 3:18
Marriage law survey (5 coins)
Why do you think the Government refused to pass the bill to allow same-sex marriage without a public opinion survey? Do you think the bill would have been passed if the public had voted 'no'? Share your thoughts on the 'Survey forum'.
The vote
Parliament voted on the issue of same-sex marriage on the 7th of December, 2017. Watch the next video to see the moment same-sex marriage was made legal in Australia:
Playing time: 2:20
LGBT+ (5 coins)
Do you think the legalisation of same-sex marriage has had a wider impact on the movement to gain equality and recognition for LGBT+ people in Australia? What progress has been made, and what challenges still need to be overcome? What cultural changes are currently occurring in this area? Share your thoughts and observations on the 'LGBT+ forum'.
Complete one or both of the activities below.
What events that are currently unfolding do you think will be seen as historically important in the future? Choose one such event and write an article about it, including an explanation of why it is so important. Note that your chosen event doesn't have to be Australian, but it does have to be current - it could be happening anywhere in the world. Share your article on the 'History unfolding forum'.
Prime Minister Paul Keating delivered a speech about the wrong-doings of white Australia in December 1992, in the Sydney suburb of Redfern, which has a strong Aboriginal community. Watch the speech and take notes on the most important points:
Playing time: 16:49
Keating says 'the problem starts with us - the non-Aboriginal Australians'. Create something that draws on Keating's speech to encourage non-Aboriginal people to think more deeply about Australian history, and Australia's First Nations people. This could be a poster, a blog post, or a video. When you are done, add your work to a new page of the 'Redfern Wiki'. You can read about how to edit Wikis here.